Disposed¶25

Bikram Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jan 2024CWJC/12836/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC 12836/2023, Patna High Court, 03-01-2024, Sandeep Kumar J. Petitioner Bikram Kumar (Khagaul, Patna; respondents include State of Bihar, District Arms Magistrate, SSP Patna, SHO Khagaul) withdrew writ application with permission; liberty granted to file Arms Appeal before Commissioner within 30 days; appeal to be decided on merits within six months of filing. Keywords: withdrawal of writ, arms appeal, Commissioner, disposal as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an Arms Appeal before the Commissioner within 30 days; such appeal, if filed in time, to be considered and decided on merits after hearing the petitioner and within six months of its filing. ¶25

Bikram Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12836 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Bikram Kumar Son of Late Shivnath Prasad @ late Shiv Nath Prasad Resident of Vilalge-Jamaluddin Chak, Post Office and Police StationKhagaul, Distirct-Patna, PIn Code-801105.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Patna.

¶10

The District Arms Magistrate, Patna.

¶11

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

¶12

The Sub Divisional Police officer, Danapur, Patna.

¶13

The Station House Officer, Khagaul Police Station, Patna.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate Ms. Aastha Ananya, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.M. Nasrul Huda Khan ( Sc 1 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 03-01-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

2 . After some argument, learned counsel for the

¶18

petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file an Arms Appeal before the Commissioner concerned.

¶19

3 . Permission is accorded.

¶20

4 . This application is disposed of as withdrawn

¶21

with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the Commissioner within 30 days from today.

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.12836 of 2023(2) dt.03-01-2024 2/2

¶23

5 . If such an Appeal is filed within 30 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the Commissioner concerned on merits after hearing the petitioner. The appeal must be decided within six months of its filing.

¶24

6 . With the aforesaid observation and direction, this

¶25

application is disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

¶26

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶27

Shishir/-

¶28

Bikram Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bikram Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramdahin Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Indu Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Reyasatullah Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Ramji Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Babu Ali Vs The State of Bihar