Dismissed

Shail Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Aug 2024CWJC/12431/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition involving social welfare benefits. Applying the Supreme Court's principles in State of Karnataka vs Ameerbi, the Court declined to grant the sought relief and directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority following relevant guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to approach appropriate authority per guidelines; relief denied.

Shail Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12431 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Shail Kumari W/O Uday Kumar Gupta, R/O Village Vegetable Market (Thana Gali), Ward No.9, Block Rafiganj, Nagar Panchayat- Rafiganj, P.S. Rafiganj, District Aurangabad.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

1.The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

¶8

The Collector cum District Magistrate, Aurangabad

¶9

The District Welfare Officer, Aurangabad

¶10

The District Programming Officer, Aurangabad

¶11

The District Development Commissioner, Aurangabad.

¶12

The Child Development Project Officer, Block Refiganj, Aurangabad.

¶13

the Block Development Officer, Rafiganj, Aurangabad.

¶14

Gudiya Kumari W/O Vijay Prasad, R/O Math Muhalla, Ward No.9, Nagar Panchayat Rafiganj, Block Rafiganj, P.S. Rafiganj, District Aurangabad.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

======================================================

¶17

Appearance :

¶18

For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Mukul Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Government Pleader (20)

¶19

======================================================

¶20

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶21

2 20-08-2024

¶22

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned GP No.20 for the Respondents/State.

¶23

Considering the relief(s) as sought for in the present writ petition and in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka & Others vs Ameerbi and others, reported in (2007) 11 SCC 681 , this Court is not inclined to grant relief to the petitioner, however, the petitioner may approach the appropriate authority in accordance with the provision of guidelines, for the relief(s) as sought for in the present writ petition.

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.12431 of 2024(2) dt.20-08-2024 2/2

¶25

The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶26

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶27

chn/-

¶28

Shail Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shail Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Awadhesh Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sonam Singh @ Sonam Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeshwar Prasad Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ravikant Kumar Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Awdhesh Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Prakash Ranjan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.