The writ petition filed under the Civil Writ Jurisdiction was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. No substantive legal issue was determined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12311 of 2024
======================================================
Saurav Gupta, S/o Vijay Kumar Gupta, R/o- Nai Bazar Chapra, near Choti Maszid, Chapra, 841301.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Singh, Advocate Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocate For the Res. No. 2 : Mr. Ranjeet Choubey, Advocate Mr. Jainandra Kumar, Advocate For the Nagar Parishad : Mr. Gopal Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Partha Sarthy, J)
Sujit/-
U
Saurav Gupta
State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department
Nagar Parishad
District Magistrate, Bhojpur
Shri Arun Singh
Shrimati Soniya Devi
K. Vinod Chandran
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
