Bijay Kumar v. The Bihar State Religious Trust Board

Patna HC2 Dec 2024CWJC/12032/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bihar State Religious Trust Board; President's letter to ADM Revenue; Circle Officer inquiry - mutation by fraud and forgery; Tribunal Case No. 5 of 2024 - encroachment application; Section 28(2)(u) of the Act - public or private trust; Thakurji Maharaj Sarbahdi Thakurbadi Trust Committee; direction to act within six weeks; writ petition disposed of; Patna High Court CWJC 12032/2022.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the concerned A.D.M., Revenue to immediately act upon the President's letter and communicate the action taken within six weeks; writ petition disposed of with these observations. ¶¶35

Bijay Kumar Vs The Bihar State Religious Trust Board — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12032 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Bijay Kumar son of late Satyanarayan Prasad, resident of Village- Karkain, Police Station- Ghoswari, District- Patna.

¶4

Uma Shankar Singh s/o late Sukhdeo Singh, resident of Village- Karkain, Police Station- Ghoswari, District- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Bihar State Religious Trust Board Vidyapati Marg, PS- Kotwali Patna 800001 through its President.

¶8

President, Bihar State Religious Trust Board having its office at Vidyapati Marg, PS- Kotwali, Patna 800001.

¶9

Superintendent, Bihar State Religious Trust Board having its office at Vidyapati Marg, PS- Kotwali, Patna 800001.

¶10

Shri Thakurji Maharaj Sarbahdi Thakurbadi Trust Committee, VillageSarbahdi, P.S.- Manpur, District- Nalanda, through its President, Pin Code803101.

¶11

Upendra Kumar Yadav S/o Khirodhi Yadav, Secretary of Thakurji Maharaj Sarbahdi Thakurbadi Trust Committee, resident of Village- Ishanagar, PostKarkain, Police Station- Ghoswari, District- Patna, Pin Code- 811104.

¶12

Suresh Yadav S/o Ramfal Yadav, President of Sri Thakurji Maharaj Sarbahdi Thakurbadi Trust Committee, resident of Village- Ishanagar, Post- Karkain, Police Station- Ghoswari, District- Patna, Pin Code- 811104.

¶13

Shivdani Yadav S/o Basudev Yadav, Treasurer of the Thakurbadi Sarbahdi Trust Committee, resident of Village- Ishanagar, Post- Karkain, Police Station- Ghoswari, District- Patna, Pin Code- 811104.

¶14

Khirodhi Yadav, son of Sakal Yadav, member of said trust Committee, resident of Village- Ishanagar, Post- Karkain, Police Station- Ghoswari, District- Patna, Pin Code- 811104.

¶15

Lalit Mahto, s/o Dukhan Mahto, member of said trust Committee, resident of Village- Ishanagar, Post- Karkain, Police Station- Ghoswari, DistrictPatna, Pin Code- 811104.

¶16

Suman Kumar, s/o Madhusudan Prasad, member of said trust Committee, resident of Village- Ishanagar, Post- Karkain, Police Station- Ghoswari, District- Patna, Pin Code- 811104.

¶17

Sohan Sharma s/o late Shibu Thakur, Pujari-cum- Member, resident of Village and Post Office- Sarbahdi, P.S.- Manpur, District- Nalanda, Pin 803101.

¶18

Kaushlendra Yadav, s/o Babulal Yadav, Pujari-cum- Member, resident of Village and Post Office- Sarbahdi, P.S.- Manpur, District- Nalanda, Pin 803101.

¶19

Ram Briksh Pandey, s/o late Sahdev Pandey member of sarbahadi thakurbadi trust committee, resident of Village and Post Office- Sarbahdi, P.S.- Manpur, District- Nalanda, Pin 803101.

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.12032 of 2022(3) dt.02-12-2024 2/3

¶21

... ... Respondent/s

¶22

=============== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent ===============	======================================= : Mr. Ram Chandra Prasad, Adv. Mr. Samir Kr. Sinha, Adv. : Mr.Shekhar Singh, Adv. =======================================
CORAM: HONOU PANDEY	RABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

3 02-12-2024

¶25

Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

¶26

The petitioner claims the land in question to be their purchased property in the year 1999. They also claim that the trust in question is private and not the public.

¶27

Be that as it may, the Bihar State Religious Trust Board (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’), is empowered to decide whether a trust is public or private under Section 28(2)(u) of the Act.

¶28

An application was filed by the Board before the Tribunal with a prayer to declare the petitioner as encroacher of the disputed land and for removing all the encroachments. That application was registered as Case No. 5 of 2024.

¶29

Learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that after purchasing that land, their names were mutated in revenue records, but the proceeding is still pending before the Tribunal. Meanwhile, the President, Bihar State Religious Trust Board passed the impugned order whereby a letter was sent to ADM, Revenue to consider the report of the Circle Officer in which he

¶30

Patna High Court CWJC No.12032 of 2022(3) dt.02-12-2024 3/3

¶31

(the Circle Officer) has reported that the names of the petitioners were mutated by committing forgery. Learned counsel has also submitted that the Board is not empowered to send such type of letters to the Mutation Authority.

¶32

It appears that, after mutation of the names of the petitioners in the revenue records in respect of property in question, an inquiry was conducted by the Circle Officer in which he has found that the names of the petitioners were recorded in the revenue records by playing fraud and committing forgery.

¶33

The president of the Board has rightly sent the letter, requesting the A.D.M., Revenue to look into the matter and to communicate the action taken by him with intimation to the Board.

¶34

The concerned A.D.M., Revenue is directed to immediately act upon the letter of the President and communicate him with the action taken by him in respect of letter of the President, within six weeks.

¶35

With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶36

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶37

kundan/- U

Bijay Kumar v. The Bihar State Religious Trust Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bijay Kumar v. The Bihar State Religious Trust Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sabaya Khatoon Vs the State of Bihar

Guddu Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Rubi Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Rajnarayan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Studio Vs The State of Bihar

Satya Narayan Jha Vs The State of Bihar