Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ application, stating his grievance was redressed during its pendency. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11992 of 2012
======================================================
Surendra Kumar Choudhary S/O Late Jago Choudhary Resident Of VillageParoha, P.S- Manpur, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dr. Anjani Pd. Singh,Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhakar Tekriwal
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
Heard Mr. Anjani Prasad Singh, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this writ application the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.
Permission is accorded.
This application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/- U
Surendra Kumar Choudhary
The State Of Bihar through Secretary Scheduled Caste And Schedule Tribe Welfare Department
The Chairman Bihar Mahadalit Vikash Mission
The District Magistrate, Nalanda
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Nalanda
The District Welfare Officer, Nalanda
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
