Disposed

Ranvijay Kumar Patel v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Feb 2024CWJC/11923/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a court direction to restore security withdrawn after his brother and security guard were killed. The State said allotment requires ADG Security recommendation; the court disposed of the petition with liberty to approach ADG Security, who must decide within two months.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to petitioner to apply to ADG Security; ADG Security to consider application and pass appropriate order within two months.

Ranvijay Kumar Patel Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11923 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ranvijay Kumar Patel Son of Ganori Singh Resident of Village-Sudhari P.S. Telmar, District-Nalanda, at Present Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Soradih Cum President Mukhiya Sang, Block Harnaut, Distirct-Nalanda.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Inspector General of Police (Security), Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.

¶11

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.

¶12

The S.H.O. Cum Officer in-Charge, Telmar Police Station, District-Nalanda.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Chandra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Md. N.H. Khan, SC-1 ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶16

5 15-02-2024 Heard the parties.

¶17

The present application has been filed for a

¶18

direction to the respondents authorities to provide security guard to the petitioner and his family members.

¶19

The contention of the petitioner is that his brother as well as his security guard were killed by criminals. Thereafter, he was provided security which has now been withdrawn by the Government.

¶20

The petitioner has represented to the District Magistrate, Nalanda for providing security guard.

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.11923 of 2023(5) dt.15-02-2024 2/2

¶22

Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the allotment of security guard can be done only on the recommendation of the ADG Security and the petitioner may approach him for allotment of security guard.

¶23

In these circumstances, considering the submission of the State, the application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the ADG Security for redressal of his grievances and if such an application is filed, the same shall be considered by the ADG Security within two months of its filing and an appropriate order be passed on the application of the petitioner.

¶24

With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application is disposed of.

¶25

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶26

P. Kumar

¶27

Ranvijay Kumar Patel v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranvijay Kumar Patel v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Tileshra Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ganga Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vijay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Syed Imtyaz Ahsan Vs The State of Bihar

Mamta Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.