A writ petition challenging the quantum of punishment in disciplinary proceedings was dismissed. The court held that the penalty was commensurate with the gravity of the offence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11908 of 2013
======================================================
Indrajeet Kumar S/O Sri Brahmdeo Singh, Quarter No. 476 Sector II, BlockE, Bhuli Sramik Nagar, P.O and Police Station Bhuli, District- Dhanbad Jharkhand
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the UOI /s : Mr.Anurag Singh, CGC ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
9 13-08-2024
Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Anurag Singh, learned CGC for the Union of India.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11908 of 2013(9) dt.13-08-2024 2/2
gravity of the offence committed by the petitioner.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
chn/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quantum of punishment imposed on the petitioner was disproportionate to the gravity of the charge?
Indrajeet Kumar
The Union of India
Director General of C.R.P.F. Central Office
Commandant 95 Battalion, C.R.P.F.
I.G., C.R.P.F. Sector, Bihar
I.G. C.R.P.F Bibhatikhand Gomatinagar
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
