Petitioner challenged her selection as Anganwari Sevika in 2004. Relying on Apex Court precedent, the Court declined to grant relief and directed the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy before the competent Civil Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11832 of 2013
======================================================
Smt. Suganti Devi Wife Of Sanjay Singh Resident Of Village - Jamuaon, P.S. - Sandesh, District - Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ayush Kumar, Advocate Mr. Vivek, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 06-08-2024
Heard Mr. Ayush Kumar along with Mr. Vivek, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, learned AC to GA 9 for the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11832 of 2013(3) dt.06-08-2024 2/2
sought for in the present writ petition.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Sanjay/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in the selection of Anganwari Sevika from 2004?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Karnataka & Others vs Ameerbi and othersRelied on¶15
(2007) 11 SCC 681 · Who else cites this
Smt. Suganti Devi
State of Bihar through Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar
Director, Integrated Child Development Services, (Social Welfare Department), Bihar
District Magistrate Cum-Collector, Bhojpur
District Programme Officer, Bhojpur
Child Development Project Officer, Sandesh Bhojpur
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
