The court directed the District Magistrate to consider a fresh representation by the petitioner alleging forged certificates in the appointment of a Vikas Mitra, after hearing the appointed person, and pass a reasoned order within three weeks.
Direction to District Magistrate to pass reasoned order within three weeks after hearing Respondent No. 9.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11677 of 2012
======================================================
Dulam Ram Ram
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Pd Singh No.1, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhakar Jha, GP-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
3 02-01-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11677 of 2012(3) dt.02-01-2024 2/2
is filed on behalf of the respondent-State.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
ajay/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appointment of Respondent No. 9 as Vikas Mitra was based on forged or fabricated certificates?
Dulam Ram Ram
The State Of Bihar
Others
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
