Disposed

Md. Firoz Alam v. The State Election Commission (Panchayat)

Patna HC22 Aug 2024CWJC/11430/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the quantification of reimbursement claims after an enquiry conducted ex-parte. The Court directed the District Magistrate to reconsider the bills upon proper representation and a hearing, ordering completion within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to make a representation; respondent ordered to verify bills after hearing and pass a reasoned order within 12 weeks if the claim is rejected.

Md. Firoz Alam Vs The State Election… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11430 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Md. Firoz Alam Son of Md. Abdul Jabbar, Resident of Village- Rampur Lodge Ward No. 15, Ashram Road, Police Station- Araria, District- Araria.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Election Commission (Panchayat) 3rd Floor, Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna through its Secretary,

¶7

The Secretary, the State Election Commission (Panchayat), 3rd Floor, Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate cum District Election Officer (Panchayat), Purnia, District-Purnia.

¶9

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Purnia, District-Purnia.

¶10

¶11

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Purnia, District-Purnia.

¶12

The In-charge Additional Collector, District Abhilekhagaar, Purnia, DistrictPurnia.

¶13

The District Account Officer, Purnia, District-Purnia.

¶14

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Dept., Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, Adv. : Mr. Akash Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Smt. Archana Meenakshee (Gp6) ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER

¶18

4 22-08-2024

¶19

Having regard to the fact that there is a dispute

¶20

with regard to the bills submitted by the petitioner and in the counter-affidavit filed by the respondents, it is stated that on enquiry it was found that some of the bills furnished by the petitioner were found to be forged, therefore, the amount payable to the petitioner was quantified at Rs. 37,11,972/- (Thirty Seven Lakh Eleven Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy Two) as against Rs. 84,80,718/- (Eighty

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.11430 of 2023(4) dt.22-08-2024 2/3

¶22

Four Lakh Eighty Thousand Seven Hundred Eighteen) raised by the petitioner. Admittedly, the enquiry has been conducted by the authority concerned behind the back of the petitioner without putting him on notice nor giving him an opportunity of representing his case.

¶23

Having regard to the same, the present writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make a suitable representation along with the necessary documents to substantiate the bills raised by him and the District Magistrate-cum-District Election Officer (Panchayat), Purnia, District-Purnia (respondent No. 3) shall consider the said representation and verify the bills without adverting to the enquiry report. In case the claim of

¶24

the petitioner is found to be genuine, the authority shall make the necessary payments and in case the authority is of the opinion that the claim of the petitioner is not genuine, he will pass a reasoned order giving the reasons for rejecting the claim. It is needless to mention that before passing any orders, the petitioner shall be given an opportunity of hearing. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 12

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.11430 of 2023(4) dt.22-08-2024 3/3

¶26

weeks from the date of receipt of the representation from the petitioner. Any order passed shall be communicated to the petitioner.

¶27

With the above direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶28

(A. Abhishek Reddy, J)

¶29

Ayush/-

¶30

Md. Firoz Alam v. The State Election Commission (Panchayat)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Firoz Alam v. The State Election Commission (Panchayat)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Premlata Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Preeti Kumari @ Priti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Ruplal Ram @ Rupalal Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Devi Vs The State of Bihar