Pappu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

“That this writ application is being filed on behalf of the petitioner above named for issuance of an appropriate writ, order and direction for quashing the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Hajipur and issued vide Memo No. 211 dated 18/5/2019 whereby and where under P.D.S. license of the petitioner’s father namely Harendra Singh who was a P.D.S. dealer has been cancelled contained in (Annexure-1) as well as quashing the order passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Vaishali in P.D.S. Appeal Case No. 10/ 2022-23 and issued vide Memo No. 287 dated 6/4/2023 whereby and where under appeal filed by the petitioner’s father namely Harendra Singh has been closed only on a sole ground that during pendency of this appeal, father of the petitioner who was an appellant was died without considering substitution petition of the petitioner or merit of this case (Annexure-9) and further direction to the respondents to consider the name of the petitioner and to issue P.D.S. license on compassionate ground in the name of the petitioner and till final order not to issue any P.D.S. license to another on place of the petitioner.”

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No. 10849 of 2023(4) dt.26-10-2024 2/3

¶20

petitioner has stated that the petitioner was pursuing the appeal before the District Magistrate, Vaishali, District- Vaishali i.e. Respondent No. 2 herein. However, the Respondent No. 2, without deciding the appeal on merits, has dismissed the appeal solely on the ground that the original appellant i.e. the father of the petitioner had died and the appeal has become infructuous. Learned counsel has stated that the application made by the petitioner for substituting the name of the father was pending adjudication, but the authority did not go into the merits of the said application and dismissed the appeal on technicalities in a mechanical and pedantic manner.

¶21

Admittedly, the impugned order has been passed by the appellate authority on technicalities and not on the merits of the case. The appellate authority ought to have passed the order on merits duly substituting the name of the petitioner in lieu of the name of his father. In case, the petitioner succeeds in the appeal, he can file an application for appointment on compassionate grounds. Unless and until the order of cancellation is set aside, the petitioner’s right to be appointed on compassionate ground cannot be entertained.

¶22

The view expressed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court supported by judgment of the Division

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No. 10849 of 2023(4) dt.26-10-2024 3/3

¶24

Bench passed in CWJC No. 5959 of 2022 dated 28.07.2022 is squarely applicable to the facts of this case and is as under:-

¶25

“The petitioner is desirous of seeking license on compassionate ground but that could be done only after it is found by the Appellate Authority that the licence of the petitioner was wrongly cancelled.

¶26

Precisely, for this purpose, the petitioner has filed a substitution petition before the District Authority seeking a request to substitute him in place of his mother so that the appeal could be contested.”

¶27

Having regard to the above, the impugned order

¶28

dated 06.04.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Vaishali is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the appellate authority for considering the matter afresh and pass a reasoned order. The appellate authority shall substitute the name of the petitioner in lieu of the name of his father. It is also made clear that the substitution of the name of the petitioner will not confer any right on the petitioner to get the license in his name. In case, the appeal is allowed, it will only make him eligible for being considered for appointment under the compassionate ground.

¶29

With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶30

(A. Abhishek Reddy, J)

¶31

Ayush/-

¶32

U

Pappu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Pvc Processor Vs The State of Bihar

Wakil Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar through Shri Robert L. Chongtu Principal Secretary

M/s Bihar Trade Towers Pvt. Ltd. earlier known as M/S Aishwarya Foundation Vs The State of Bihar through the Development Commissioner cum Chairman

Bulai @ Bulae Marandi Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Naurangi Yadav Vs The State of Bihar