Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Singh Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10420 of 2024

======================================================

Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Singh Son of Late Bharat Singh, Resident of Village- Lejuwar, P.S.- Daudpur, District- Saran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Collector, Saran at Chapra.

¶8

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Chapra.

¶9

The Block Supply Officer, Rivilganj, Chapra.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader (27)

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 16-12-2024 Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

¶14

This writ petition has been filed for seeking the

¶15

following relief(s):-

¶16

“(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order contained in Memo No. 244 dated 14.01.2019 passed by the Respondent No. 3 (S.D.O. Sadar Chapra) by which the PDS license of the petitioner License No. 01/2016 has been cancelled.

¶17

(ii) For issuance of a writ in the certiorari for quashing the order dated 12.06.2023 passed in Supply Appeal No. 05/2019 by the Learned Colllector, Saran at Chapra by which he was please to dismissed the appeal without appreciating the points raised on

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.10420 of 2024(2) dt.16-12-2024 2/5

¶19

behalf of the petitioner.

¶20

(iii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to restore the PDS license of the petitioner being License No. 01/2016 and also the authority may be directed to make allotment to the petitioner.”

¶21

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has stated that in the Show Cause Notice issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer there is no proposal for cancellation of the license. Learned counsel has stated that non-mentioning of the proposal for cancelling his license is contrary to the provisions of order 27(ii) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Order, 2016’).

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on the judgment of the full Bench passed in CWJC No.21202 of 2021 and analogous cases dated 26.09.2023 to buttress his contention that non-mentioning of the proposed action in the show-cause notice is bad in law and contrary to Rule 27(ii) of the Control Order, 2016.

¶23

Learned counsel has stated in view of the above mentioned provisions of law and judgment relied by the petitioner, the impugned order may be set aside and matter

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.10420 of 2024(2) dt.16-12-2024 3/5

¶25

remanded back to the authorities concerned for issuing a fresh show-cause notice in terms of order 27(ii) of the Control Order, 2016 and thereafter take necessary action.

¶26

Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has vehemently opposed the very maintainability of the writ petition and stated that the present writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has exhausted all the remedies and all the authorities have found that the petitioner has violated the provisions of the Control Order, 2016. Learned counsel has therefore prayed this Hon’ble Court to dismiss the present writ petition.

¶27

This Hon’ble Court in CWJC No.21202 of 2021 and analogous cases has held as under:

¶28

“ 19. Accordingly, we answer the reference as under:-

¶29

It is mandatory for a licensing authority issuing a notice under order 27(ii) to a license to mention that there is a proposal for cancellation of his license, failing which such notice cannot be treated to be a valid notice of giving sufficient opportunity to the licensee to state his case under order 27(ii) of the BTPDS Control Order. ”

¶30

A perusal of the show-cause notice issued to the

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No.10420 of 2024(2) dt.16-12-2024 4/5

¶32

petitioner does not reveal that there is any proposal of the action sought to be taken against the petitioner. Therefore, the same has to held as bad, illegal, contrary to the provisions of Rule 27(ii) of the Control Order and has to necessarily set aside.

¶33

Having regard to the above facts and circumstances and the law laid down by this Hon’ble Court, the present CWJC is allowed. The impugned order passed by the Appellate Authority dated 12.06.2023 as well as the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Chapra dated 14.01.2019 are set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Sub-divisional Officer for issuing a fresh show-cause notice to the petitioner strictly in compliance with the provisions of Rule 27(ii) of the Control Order, 2016 and call for his explanation by giving him reasonable time.

¶34

On such show-cause notice being served, the petitioner shall file his explanation within the stipulated time. On receipt of the explanation submitted by the petitioner the authority concerned shall pass a reasoned order strictly in accordance with law duly taking into consideration the explanation submitted by the petitioner.

¶35

It is needless to mention that before passing any orders, the petitioner shall be given an opportunity of hearing.

¶36

Patna High Court CWJC No.10420 of 2024(2) dt.16-12-2024 5/5

¶37

The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Any order passed shall be communicated to the petitioner.

¶38

With the above directions, this Writ Petition is allowed to the extent indicated above.

¶39

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J)

¶40

Gauravkr/-

¶41

U

Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Winsome International Limited Vs The State of Bihar

Lallan Bin Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

M/s Laxmi Enterprises Quality offset Printers and General order Suppliers Vs The State of Bhar

Surya Bhusan Kuswaha Vs The State of Bihar

Mrs. Usha Devi Vs The Canara Bank