Writ petition concerning forest/wood-based industry licensing was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the appropriate forum; permission accorded and petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10046 of 2023
======================================================
Akbar Ansari Son of Azimuddin Ansari, Resident of village-Ramchandra Dih, P.S.- Chakai, District-Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinay Mistry, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sarvesh Kr. Singh (AAG13) Mr. Abhinav Alok, AC to AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
3 29-04-2024 After some arguments, Mr. Vinay Mistry, learned
counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to move to the appropriate forum.
with the liberty aforesaid.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
perwez
U
Akbar Ansari
The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest-cum-Chairman Of State Level Committee for Wood-based Industries, Bihar, Patna
The Licensing Officer-cum-Divisional Forest Officer, Jamui Forest Division, Jamui
The Forester, Chakai
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
