Criminal revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution; petitioners absent on multiple dates and failed to remove office defects despite opportunities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.947 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Katihar
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
unattended by the petitioners. Even the defect(s) as pointed out by the Office have not been removed by the petitioners despite several opportunities. It shows that the petitioners are not
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.947 of 2019(5) dt.12-12-2024 2/2
interested to prosecute the present petition.
prosecution.
(Jitendra Kumar, J.)
Ramesh, S. Ali/-
U T
Wasila Khatun
Sitara Khatoon
Gulam Wasis
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Katihar
The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Barsoi, Katihar
The Officer In-Charge-Officer, Balrampur Police Station
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
