The petitioner in the criminal revision died during the pendency of the proceedings. The court disposed of the matter by holding that the revision abates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.823 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2004 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur
======================================================
Rampari Devi w/o Jagdish Pandit, resident of village- Mau Sherpur, P.S. Vidyapatinagar, District-Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Soni Shrivastava, Adv., Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj, Adv., Mr. Gaurav Singh, Adv. For the O.P. : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI
ORAL ORDER
Learned Advocate for the petitioner of the instant criminal revision submits that during pendency of the instant revision the petitioner has died on 18th June, 2017.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
pravinkumar/-
U T
Rampari Devi
State Of Bihar
Srijan Devi
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
