Dismissed¶13
Ajay Sah v. Urmila Devi
Patna HCCR. REV./459/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Patna High Court, Criminal Revision No.459 of 2019, decided 11-01-2024 by Bibek Chaudhuri, J. Petitioner Ajay Sah vs respondent Urmila Devi; petitioner represented by Umesh Chandra Verma and Hemant Ray, no counsel named for respondent. Arises out of P.S. case (number/year blank), District West Champaran. Oral order: impugned order perused, no reason for inference (interference) found; revision dismissed. No statutory provisions or case law cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully perusing the impugned order, the Court found no reason for interference. ¶12