Allowed

Ismail Khan and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Feb 2024CR. REV./253/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In criminal revision, the Court set aside an order of conviction and sentence under Section 379 IPC. The High Court held that the prosecution failed to prove ownership of the bamboo grove, rendering the conviction unsustainable.

What did the court decide?

The order of conviction and sentence under Section 379 of the I.P.C. is set aside; accused persons are acquitted and released from bail bonds.

Ismail Khan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.253 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-1990 Thana- POTHIYA District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ismail Khan, S/o Manwar Khan, resident of village- Saithabari, Police Station- Pothia, District- Kishanganj.

¶5

Kabil Khan @ Rahil Khan, S/o Asi Khan, resident of village- Taiyabpur, Police Station- Pothia, District- Kishanganj.

¶6

Nurul Khan, S/o Tamij Khan, resident of village- Taiyabpur, Police StationPothia, District- Kishanganj.

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

		Versus
The State of Bihar
===============	==========	... ... Respondent/s =============================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s	: Md. Md. Md. Md.	Abdul Mannan Khan, Adv., Anamul Haque, Adv., Najmul Hodda, Adv., Hatiz Shahbaz Arif, Adv.
For the State ===============	: Mr. ==========	Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP =============================
CORAM: HONOU	RABLE MR.	JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI

¶9

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶10

Date : 08-02-2024

¶11

Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioners are convicted for committing offence under Section 379 of the I.P.C. and they were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 379 of the I.P.C.

¶13

The order of conviction and sentence passed in G.R. Case No. 314 of 1990, Tr. No. 819 of 2003 (arising out of Pothiya P.S. Case No. 39 of 1990), by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial

¶14

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.253 of 2018 dt.08-02-2024 2/4

¶15

Magistrate, Kishanganj, dated 23^rd July, 2003 was affirmed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Kishanganj, in Criminal Appeal No. 29/80/2003. The convicts have assailed the order of conviction and sentence under Section 379 of the I.P.C., which was affirmed by the appellate court in the instant revision.

¶16

It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that over an incident, which allegedly took place in the night on 14^th April, 1990, the informant lodged a complaint in the local Police Station on 18^th April, 1990, alleging, inter alia, that the petitioner along with accused Baudha Khan @ Raja Khan and Kalwa Khan had cut down green bamboos from the bamboo grove of the informant in the night on 14^th April, 1990. At that point of time the informant was sleeping in his room. Hearing the sound of cutting of bamboo he and his cousin brother proceeded towards the place whereafter the said sound was coming. Under the torch light, they found that the accused persons were cutting the bamboos from his bamboo grove and they already took away 71 numbers of bamboos from the said bamboo grove. On the basis of said complaint, Police registered Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 98 of 1990, dated 14^th April, 1990 and took up the case for investigation. On completion of investigation, Police submitted charge-sheet against the petitioners under Section 379 of the I.P.C. against accused

¶17

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.253 of 2018 dt.08-02-2024 3/4

¶18

Baudha Khan and Kalwa Khan @ Raja Khan under Section 379/411 of the I.P.C. The accused persons appeared before the trial court to face trial.

¶19

During trial prosecution examined in all eight witnesses. Amongst them P.W.4 Radheshyam Sharma, is the informant. PW.1 and PW.6 are the witnesses to the seizure list. PW.5 and PW.7 were tendered by the prosecution. Remaining witnesses are in the nature of hearsay. Therefore, except PW.4, who is the informant, there is no other eye witness of the occurrence. It is stated by PW.2 that from the house of accused Kalwa Khan, 11 numbers of bamboos, from the house of Bodha Khan, 14 numbers of bamboos and from the house of Khurshid Khan, 10 numbers of bamboos were recovered. It has come in evidence that there are other bamboo groves in the village and there is a local market where bamboos are sold and purchased.

¶20

It was the primary duty of the prosecution to prove that the place from where bamboos were stolen was owned by the defacto complainant on the date of occurrence and there was bamboo grove on the said plot of land. The Investigation Officer failed to conclude any evidence with regard to ownership of the plot to show that the informant was the owner of the said plot and

¶21

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.253 of 2018 dt.08-02-2024 4/4

¶22

there was bamboo grove therein and bamboos were stolen from the said bamboo grove.

¶23

In the absence of such evidence, this Court fails to understand as to how the learned courts below held that the accused persons/petitioners committed offence of theft of bamboos from the bamboo grove, owned by the defacto complainant.

¶24

For the reasons stated above, I am not in a position to concur with the findings of the learned courts blow and the order of conviction and sentence against the petitioner under Section 379 of the I.P.C. is set aside.

¶25

The accused persons are acquitted from the charges set at liberty and released from their respective bail bonds.

¶26

The instant revision is thus allowed.

¶27

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)

¶28

pravinkumar/-

¶29

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date
Transmission Date

Ismail Khan and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ismail Khan and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Agam Kumar Jha Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Rajesh Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Krishna Kant Dubey Vs the State of Bihar

Manoranjan Kumar Sinha @ Manoranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ashok Mandal Vs Amrita Devi and Anr.

Sujeet Kumar Vs the State of Bihar