Allowed

Sanjay Gond v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Apr 2024CR. MISC./9311/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a complaint case involving alleged dowry harassment and cruelty under Sections 498A IPC and 4 DP Act. Bail was granted subject to a bond of Rs. 20,000 and standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties of like amount each, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Sanjay Gond Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9311 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2021 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBuxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanjay Gond, aged about 32 years, Gender-Male, S/o Nand Bihari Gond @ Motishan Gond, R/o Village - Chakki (Lakshaman Dera), P.S. - Brahmpur, District - Buxar

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Poonam Devi, W/o Sanjay Gond, D/o Shivji Gond, R/o Village - Mahraura, P.S. - Dumraon, District – Buxar.

¶9

... ... Opposite Parties

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Sangeeta Sharma, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 23-04-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶15

counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 102 (C) of 2021 dated 30.01.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the I.P.C. and Section 4 of the D.P. Act.

¶17

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and other co-accused persons are alleged to have tortured the complainant mentally and physically due to non-fulfilment of demand of Rs. 1,00,000/- and motorcycle as dowry.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9311 of 2024(3) dt.23-04-2024 2/3

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the complainant. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant and he has no concern with the alleged offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. It is submitted that the opposite party no. 2 always make pressure to the petitioner to reside in his sasural to which he was not ready, hence, she went to her naihar on 20.12.2021 alongwith her entire ornaments in absence of the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is ready to keep the opposite party no. 2 and her children with full dignity and love. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgments of this Court in the case of “ Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182” and in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2022) 10 SCR 351 and Md. Asfak Alam Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr. passed in Criminal Appeal No (s). 2207 of 2023 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No. 3433 of 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code is triable

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9311 of 2024(3) dt.23-04-2024 3/3

¶21

by the Magistrate. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application.

¶22

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶23

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. Buxar in connection with Complaint Case No. 102 (C) of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶24

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

¶25

The application stands allowed.

¶26

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

Sanjay Gond v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Gond v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Wasim Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lal Babu Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Manoranjan Kumar @ Manoranjan Kumar Singh @ Mukul Vs the State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mazhar Vs The State of Bihar