Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Pronoti Singh, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 22-02-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 423 of 2023 dated 14.11.2023 for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

3. As per the prosecution case, total 6.120 illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the motorcycle.

¶17

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The name of the petitioner was disclosed by local Chowkidar. The petitioner is neither the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8960 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/3

¶19

owner nor the driver of the said vehicle and the same was not being driven by the petitioner at the time of the alleged recovery. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, hence no case is made out. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089 . The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.

¶20

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case.

¶21

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8960 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 3/3

¶23

enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 423 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶24

7. The application stands allowed.

¶25

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶26

Gautam/-

¶27

U T

Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Altaf Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Mahto @ Raju Kumar Mahto Vs the State of Bihar

Dular Chand Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar