Disposed

Dinesh Singh @ Dinesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jan 2024CR. MISC./84863/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought modification of an earlier conditional anticipatory bail order after the informant withdrew support from the compromise. The court held the informant's objection was an afterthought and granted unconditional anticipatory bail with standard bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Modification of order dated 09.03.2022; petitioners released on anticipatory bail within four weeks on Rs.10,000 bonds plus two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Dinesh Singh @ Dinesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84863 of 2023

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27300 of 2021

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2020 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Dinesh Singh @ Dinesh Kumar Son Of Kapildev Singh @ Kapil Deo Singh Resident Of Village - Misarpura Kabh, Police Station - Rani Talab, District – Patna.

¶7

Ramesh Singh Son Of Kapildev Singh @ Kapil Deo Singh Resident Of Village - Misarpura Kabh, Police Station - Rani Talab, District – Patna.

¶8

... ... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Bihar.

¶11

Ravi Shankar Sharma Son Of Dharmendra Kumar Resident Of Village - Nisarpura, Police Station - Ranitalab, District – Patna.

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 05-01-2024 Heard the parties.

¶15

This application has been filed on behalf of the

¶16

petitioners for modification in the order dated 09.03.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27300 of 2021.

¶17

The following order was passed on 09.03.2022 in

¶18

Cr. Misc. No. 27300 of 2021:-

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶21

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 16 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84863 of 2023(2) dt.05-01-2024 2/3

¶23

341, 448, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶24

It has been submitted by the parties that both parties are agnates and the dispute is of trivial nature. The injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature and there is a compromise between the parties, and sending the petitioners to jail will cause more dispute between the parties.

¶25

Considering the submissions of the petitioners, they are granted anticipatory bail subject to the fact that there has been a compromise between the parties.

¶26

Accordingly, let the petitioners above named be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Danapur, Patna in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 16 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶27

The Court below will accept the bail bond of the petitioners if the compromise petition is produced by the other side and if the compromise is not supported by the other side then the petitioners shall be taken into custody.

¶28

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of.

¶29

After the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail on the basis of compromise petition, the informant filed an application and has not supported the compromise petition.

¶30

It appears that the application of the informant dated 8.3.2022 is nothing but an afterthought and the informant is now trying to resile from the compromise.

¶31

On perusal of the injury report, it appears that the injuries are simple in nature and considering the same and the

¶32

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84863 of 2023(2) dt.05-01-2024 3/3

¶33

totality of circumstances, the present application is allowed.

¶34

Accordingly, the order dated 9.3.2022 is modified

¶35

to the extent that "let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest of surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today (05.01.2024), on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Danapur, Patna in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 16 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C."

¶36

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶37

Vikas/-

¶38

Dinesh Singh @ Dinesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Singh @ Dinesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Indu Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Lalpati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ravindra Nath Trigun Vs The State of Bihar

Nagmani Vs The State of Bihar

Lala Prasad @ Lal Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar