Allowed

Jitendra Kumar @ Jeetu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Mar 2024CR. MISC./84445/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a theft case pending investigation under Sections 414/34 IPC. The court allowed release on arrest or surrender within four weeks upon furnishing a bail bond and complying with Section 438 CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on arrest or surrender within four weeks, furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to Section 438 CrPC conditions.

Jitendra Kumar @ Jeetu Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84445 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-463 Year-2022 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

JITENDRA KUMAR @ JEETU SON OF MANOJ SAO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SHERPUR, PS- SIRDALA, DIST- NAWADA,

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 07-03-2024

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶10

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case No. 463 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section-414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

Allegedly, on the secret information regarding theft of motorcycles, the informant reached at the place of occurrence and started checking the vehicle. In course of checking, two boys were found coming with motorcycle who seeing the police started fleeing away but out of them, one boy sitting on the motorcycle was apprehended whereas another boy succeeded in fleeing away. On query, the apprehended accused disclosed his name as Vikash Kumar whereas the another boy has been named as the petitioner.

¶12

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84445 of 2023(3) dt.07-03-2024 2/2

¶14

that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner has figured in confessional statement of co-accused. Nothing was recovered from his possession. He is a person of clean antecedent.

¶15

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶16

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Nawada in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case No. 463 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.

¶17

After accepting bail bond of the petitioner, the learned court below shall verify his criminal antecedent and if, he is found involved in any other case, his bail bond shall liable to be cancelled.

¶18

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶19

A.K.V.//- U T

Jitendra Kumar @ Jeetu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Kumar @ Jeetu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manto Devi and Anr. Vs Magma H.d.i. General Insurance Company Ltd. and Anr.

Union Of Inddia Through General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur Vs Anandi @ Anandi Devi

Saryug Sah Vs Hari Shankar Prasad and Ors.

Satyendra Singh Vs Smt. Rashmi Mehra

Chandan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Pappu Singh @ Pappu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar