Allowed

Sudhir Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Dec 2024CR. MISC./84038/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a liquor case where incriminating articles were recovered from motorcycles but not from his physical possession. The court imposed conditions including a monetary deposit and restriction on similar offences, subject to verification of antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail/anticipatory bail with bonds, security deposit to Mahavir Cancer Sansthan, and conditions regarding sureties and non-repetition of offence.

Sudhir Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84038 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2020 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sudhir Yadav Son of Dinesh Yadav Resident of Vill- Chhaltarpur, P.S.Andhramath, District- Madhubani

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar Patna

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 16-12-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner rather 132.600 liters of Nepali liquor is said to have been recovered from two motorcycles. The petitioner has been made accused in this case on the confessional statement of apprehended coaccused. Petitioner has no concern either with the seized liquor

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84038 of 2024(2) dt.16-12-2024 2/3

¶16

or the place of recovery or any trade of liquor. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

¶17

Petitioner is agreed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000.00 (Rupees Five Thousand) in the account of Mahavir Cancer Sansthan, bearing Account No.3332964762, Central Bank of India, Chitkohra Branch, IFSC Code :CBIN0282779 (fifth character is zero), MICR Code :800016018.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of eight weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 30 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C , subject to the further conditions that

¶19

(i) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

¶20

(ii) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84038 of 2024(2) dt.16-12-2024 3/3

¶22

similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶23

The bail bond of the petitioner shall be accepted by the learned Court below on showing receipt of deposit of the aforesaid amount in the account of Mahavir Cancer Sansthan.

¶24

The court below is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioner as what has been stated in paragraph no.3, this order will loose its force automatically.

¶25

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶26

Trivedi/-

¶27

U T

Sudhir Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shail Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Mahboob Alam Khan @ Baristar Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Altaf @ Md. Altaf Vs The State of Bihar

Md. sabir Ansari @ Md. Savir Vs The State of Bihar

Priyanka Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Ramakant Ojha Vs The State of Bihar