Pramod Rai @ Pramod Kumar Rai v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Two petitioners approached the court for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged aggravated assault and animal sacrifice. The court rejected the anticipatory bail application and granted the petitioner four weeks to surrender.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner granted four weeks to surrender for hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82698 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2022 Thana- DEWARIA District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
- PRAMOD RAI @ PRAMOD KUMAR RAI SON OF RAM PUKAR RAI R/O VILLAGE- DUBARBANNA, P.S.- DEORIA, DISTRICTMUZAFFARPUR
- RANDHIR RAI SON OF LATE JAI MANGAL RAI R/O VILLAGEDUBARBANNA, P.S.- DEORIA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP For the Informant : Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
- 3 07-03-2024
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners seeking anticipatory bail for alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 354(A), 379/34 should be granted bail.
Whether the petitioners should be granted time to surrender for hearing of the bail application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PRAMOD RAI @ PRAMOD KUMAR RAI SON OF RAM PUKAR RAI
- petitioner
RANDHIR RAI SON OF LATE JAI MANGAL RAI
- respondent
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court