Allowed

Pramod Rai @ Pramod Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Mar 2024CR. MISC./81338/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application in a firing-at-vehicle case under Sections 307/34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act; petitioner alleged false implication with case and counter case and no firearm injury. Court granted anticipatory bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted: release on bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions, upon arrest/surrender within four weeks.

Pramod Rai @ Pramod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81338 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2023 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PRAMOD RAI @ PRAMOD KUMAR son of Late Dashrath Rai VillageSAraipur Ps- Ganga Bridge Dist- Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kaushal Kishor For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 05-03-2024

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arm Act, registered in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S.Case No. 112 of 2023.

¶17

As per the allegation, the petitioner along with other accused persons, on the instigation of Amod Rai, fired indiscriminately at the vehicle of the informant with an intention to kill him.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is case and counter case. There is

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81338 of 2023(3) dt.05-03-2024 2/2

¶20

allegation of firing, but non has suffered any kind of fire-arm injury.

¶21

On the other hand, the learned APP for the State

¶22

has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶23

Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Vaishali, Hajipur in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S.Case No. 112 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶24

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶25

HR/-

¶26

U T

Pramod Rai @ Pramod Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Rai @ Pramod Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radhe Chandra Rai and Ors. Vs Shri Bhola Nath and Ors.

Renu Devi and Ors. Vs Sangita Sinha and Ors.

Arun Kumar and Anr. Vs The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Through Its Divisional Manager Legal and Anr.

Md. Irshad Vs the State of Bihar

Lal Bahadur Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar