Allowed¶¶20

Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Bail granted – Offences under Sections 30(a) and 32, Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Patna HC20 Nov 2024CR. MISC./80532/2024

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80532 of 2024, decided 20-11-2024 by Rudra Prakash Mishra, J. Bail allowed under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in Alamganj PS Case No. 924 of 2024 (Patna); recovery of 100 litres country liquor from motorcycle; custody since 17.10.2024; no antecedents; Section 103 B.N.S.S. compliance raised; bail bonds Rs.10,000/- with two sureties. Counsel: Rudra Deo for petitioner; Gulnar Begum, APP for State.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Alamganj PS Case No. 924 of 2024. ¶¶20

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80532 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-924 Year-2024 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sunil Kumar Son of Late Mahesh Mahto Villlage- Jadua Pul, P.S.- Town, District- Vaishali

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rudra Deo, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Gulnar Begum, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 20-11-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Alamganj PS Case No. 924 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

The prosecution case, in short, is that 100 litres of country made liquor was recovered from the motorcycle.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that motorcycle in question does not belong to the petitioner.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80532 of 2024(2) dt.20-11-2024 2/2

¶17

The petitioner is in custody since 17.10.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent of the petitioner and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Alamganj PS Case No. 924 of 2024.

¶21

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶22

Raj Ranjan/- U T

Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Kumar @ Shankar Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar