Anticipatory bail sought by five petitioners in a case alleging obstruction and misbehaviour with police during vehicle checking. Petitioner no. 5's application was withdrawn as he was arrested. The court enlarged petitioner nos. 1 to 4 on bail on surrender, with bail bonds and conditions under section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79641 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2024 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Saharsa
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79641 of 2024(2) dt.28-11-2024 2/3
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79641 of 2024(2) dt.28-11-2024 3/3
opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner nos. 1 to 4.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Should petitioner nos. 1 to 4 be granted anticipatory bail in Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 178 of 2024 for offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 121(1), 121(2), 132, 351(2) B.N.S.S.?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bambam Kamat
Deepak Singh @ Deepak Kumar Singh
Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Singh
Mithun Kumar Kamat @ Mithun Kumar
Santosh Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Ashok Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
