Anticipatory bail application in a case alleging land was mutated on the basis of forged partition deeds under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The court found the informant's arguments persuasive and the investigation ongoing, and declined bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78935 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-648 Year-2022 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar., Advocate Mr. Kumar Pushp Gaurav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Girish Chandra Sharma, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 02-12-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78935 of 2024(2) dt.02-12-2024 2/2
deed. He has submitted that on the basis of this deed they have got the land mutated.
rejected.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners apprehending arrest in a forgery and cheating case arising from alleged forged mutation of land should be granted anticipatory bail.
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Jitendra Kumar Singh
Surendra Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Ashok Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
