Allowed

Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar @ Kail v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Mar 2024CR. MISC./78683/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court enlarged the petitioners on bail in a criminal case involving offences under sections 307, 354, 379, and 504 IPC. The court allowed the bail prayer subject to conditions of furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties and surrendering within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of all petitioners on bail from the charges of sections 307, 354, 379, 504 IPC upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar @ Kail Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78683 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2023 Thana- KONCH District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar @ Kail S/O Pradeep Yadav Resident Of Village- Daulatpur, P.S.- Konch, Dist.- Gaya

¶5

Pradeep Yadav S/O Late Puna Yadav @ Vinod Yadav Resident Of VillageDaulatpur, P.S.- Konch, Dist.- Gaya

¶6

Neeraj Kumar S/O Vinod Yadav Resident Of Village- Daulatpur, P.S.Konch, Dist.- Gaya

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr.Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, Addl Public Prosecutor

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 19-03-2024

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶17

State.

¶18

Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307, 354, 379,504 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶19

As per the prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of the occurrence, all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners came to the house of the informant. Accused persons abused, assaulted the informant and his family members by means of lathi, danda, iron rod and also damaged household items. They took away cash and ornaments from the house of the informant. Petitioner no.1 assaulted one Udal

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78683 of 2023(3) dt.19-03-2024 2/2

¶21

Kumar on his head with Garasa. He tried to outrage modesty of the wife of the informant.

¶22

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that injury caused by petitioner no.1 has been found to be simple in nature. Learned counsel submits that due to land dispute, simple marpit took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter case.

¶23

Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of all the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VIII, Gaya in Konch Police Station Case No. 197 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶24

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶25

Shashi

¶26

U T

Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar @ Kail v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar @ Kail v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajiv Kumar Ojha Vs The State of Bihar

Shubeshwar Tiwary @Sumeshwar Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Devmuni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Rajiv Singh @ Rajiv Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar