Allowed

Rameshwar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Mar 2024CR. MISC./77790/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought pre-arrest bail in a case alleging storage of PDS rice at a co-accused's house and recovery of kerosene near his shop. The court found the allegations vague with possibility of false implication and granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted: release on bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two like sureties upon arrest or surrender within eight weeks, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Rameshwar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77790 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2019 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rameshwar Singh Son Of Late Shiv Bhajan Singh R/O Village- Masharak (EAST Tola), P.O. and P.S.- Masharak, District- Saran At Chhapra

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rananjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 07-03-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

In the present case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Masharak P.S. Case No. 115 of 2019, registered on 28.03.2019 for the offences under Sections 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.

¶16

As per prosecution case, on the basis of secret information about petitioner storing the rice of Public Distribution System in the house of co-accused Manoj Prasad, a raid was conducted and 6.5 quintals of Arwa rice was recovered from the house. Thereafter, a raid was conducted on the shop of the petitioner, who was not present at the spot and due to his absence the shop could not be searched and police found about 20 litres of kerosene oil about 500 meters away from the house

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77790 of 2023(3) dt.07-03-2024 2/3

¶18

of the petitioner.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no allegation against the petitioner that he indulged in black marketing of the PDS articles and there was no basis for secret information. Police investigated the matter and thereafter recorded its finding that the PDS articles received by the petitioner matched with the quantity available in the shop. The petitioner has nothing to do with the recovered rice from co-accused Manoj Prasad and kerosene oil lying in the field. Co-accused Manoj Prasad has been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 18.10.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46570 of 2019 by a Co-ordinate Bench. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

¶20

Learned APP opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

¶21

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the vague nature of allegation against the petitioner without any specific detail and further considering the possibility of false implication, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77790 of 2023(3) dt.07-03-2024 3/3

¶23

eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Saran at Chapra/concerned court in connection with Masharak P.S. Case No. 115 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and other following conditions :

¶24

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶25

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.

¶26

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶27

DKS/-

¶28

U T

Rameshwar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rameshwar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Binod Kumar Singh Vs Mahesh Kumar

Satyajeet Kumar Vs Prachi Ragini

Basant Kumar @ Basant Kumar Sah Vs Harendra Manjhi

Bindi Rai @ Shashi Shekhar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Amarnath Kumar @ Nanhki Vs the State of Bihar

MD Anwar Hussain @ Anwar Hussain Vs the State of Bihar