that the informant on 28.06.2010 instituted Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 148 of 2010 against one Rohit Raj Raju alleging that Rohit Raj got married to her but has refused to keep her in his house as legally wedded wife. It is thus submitted that this amply demonstrates that informant, prior to her marriage with the petitioner, was already married thrice but concealing the aforesaid marriages married the petitioner and then started extorting him. It is next submitted that since the petitioner was working with the C.I.S.F, a disciplined force, as such he was not in a position to collect the aforesaid information in time hence when a complaint came to be instituted by the informant against the petitioner before his superior authority of the C.I.S.F, the authorities of the C.I.S.F also in a mechanical manner proceeded to terminate the service of the petitioner without realising that the dispute was matrimonial for which such harsh punishment was not required. It is next submitted that had the petitioner been able to collect the information, which he collected when the instant F.I.R. came to be instituted and his service got terminated, about the conduct of the informant perhaps his service would not have been terminated as he would have been in a position to produce all the relevant documents before his superior authorities to bring to their notice that the marriage of
