Second bail application in a rape and blackmail case involving alleged videographs and demand of money; the court found no fresh ground for reconsideration and rejected the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77452 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2022 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
MANISH KUMAR YADAV S/O RAM VIRIKSH RAY R/O VILLAGEMOTIPUR, P.S- SUPPI, DISTT.- SITAMARHI.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madhubala Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satya Nand Shukla
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
rejected vide order dated 03.05.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 69409 of 2022. There is allegation against the petitioner that he committed rape upon the victim several times and he blackmailed her by showing videographs and demanded Rs. 3 lacs.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Kundan/Nirmal
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail petition should be reconsidered in absence of any fresh ground after earlier rejection.
Manish Kumar Yadav
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
