Allowed

Seikh Pervez Alam @ Sekh Parvej Alam @ Parvej v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Mar 2024CR. MISC./76737/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner apprehended arrest in a complaint case under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 over alleged dowry demand and written talaq notice to his wife. Considering the nature of accusation and his readiness to maintain and keep his wife, the High Court allowed the bail prayer.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted in event of arrest/surrender within six weeks; bail bond Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount before ACJM, Rohtas at Sasaram, subject to s.438(2) CrPC conditions.

Seikh Pervez Alam @ Sekh Parvej Alam @ Parvej Vs The State… — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76737 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2023 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SEIKH PERVEZ ALAM @ SEKH PARVEJ ALAM @ PARVEJ Son of Maqbool Alam R/o vill - Dhobha, P.S. - Chand, Distt. - Kaimur at Bhabua

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Md. Naushad Alam Son of Md. Habib Sheikh R/o vill - Parasthua, P.s. - Kochas, Distt. - Rohtas

¶9

... ... Opposite Party

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner : Mr.Md. Najmul Hodda, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr.Rajiv Nayan, Addl Public Prosecutor Mr. SK Singh, C.Swaroop, Advocate

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

3 05-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered

¶18

for the offence punishable under section 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019.

¶19

As per the prosecution case, petitioner happens to be husband of sister of opposite party no.2. petitioner and his family members are alleged to have demanded dowry and on non-fulfilment of the same, they committed torture on the victim for which opposite party no.2 lodged complaint under section 4 of the Act, 2019. Thereafter, petitioner sent a notice to the victim to the effect that he divorced her which act is an offence under section 3 of the Act, 2019.

¶20

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76737 of 2023(3) dt.05-03-2024 2/3

¶22

submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner and the victim are in police service, as such, allegation of demand of dowry coupled with harassment and cruelty appears to be improbable. However, petitioner is ready to keep the victim with him as well as to maintain her.

¶23

Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 opposes the prayer for bail. He submits that under section 3 of the Act, 2019 any pronouncement of talaq by a Muslim husband upon his wife, by words, either spoken or written or in electronic form or in any other manner whatsoever, shall be void and illegal. He further submits that as per section 7(c) of the Act, 2019 no person accused of an offence punishable under this Act shall be released on bail unless the Magistrate, on an application filed by the accused and after hearing the married Muslim woman upon whom talaq is pronounced, is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for granting bail to such person.

¶24

Considering the nature of accusation as well as the fact that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife/ sister of opposite party no.2 and he is also ready to maintain her, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioner,

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76737 of 2023(3) dt.05-03-2024 3/3

¶26

mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Complaint Case No. 04/2023, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶27

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶28

Shashi

¶29

U T

Seikh Pervez Alam @ Sekh Parvej Alam @ Parvej v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seikh Pervez Alam @ Sekh Parvej Alam @ Parvej v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Charitra Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Suryakanti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Mithilesh Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Sami Ahmad @ Md. Sami Vs The State of Bihar

MD Rustam Vs the State of Bihar

Ruplal Sah Vs the State of Bihar