Allowed¶18

Chandrakant Sahni @ Chandraket Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Nov 2024CR. MISC./76364/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail, Patna High Court, CR. MISC. No.76364 of 2024, dt. 25-11-2024; petitioners Chandrakant Sahni, Jailal Ram, Siyaram; Mahnar P.S. Case No. 76/2024, Vaishali; IPC 147/148/149/337/338/307/504 (attempt to murder); counsel Raj Dular Sah; APP Ashok Kumar Singh; bail-bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. conditions; CJM Vaishali at Hajipur; judge Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted - release on arrest or surrender within four weeks, on bail-bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur (Mahnar P.S. Case No. 76 of 2024), subject to Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. conditions. ¶18

Chandrakant Sahni @ Chandraket Sahni Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76364 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2024 Thana- MAHNAR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Chandrakant Sahni @ Chandraket Sahni Son of Udit Sahni R/O VillageJagannatpur, P.S.- Mahnar, Distt.- Vaishali

¶5

Jailal Ram Son of Late Mukhi Ram @ Late Mukharam R/O VillageJagannatpur, P.S.- Mahnar, Distt.- Vaishali

¶6

Siyaram Son of Prem Ram R/O Village- Jagannatpur, P.S.- Mahnar, Distt.Vaishali

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Dular Sah, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 25-11-2024

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶11

A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 337, 338, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The case of the prosecution is that, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, the informant along with others were coming from shop, in the meantime, the accused persons including these petitioners and 10-15 unknown persons suddenly attacked upon the informant and others with deadly weapons.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that from

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76364 of 2024(2) dt.25-11-2024 2/2

¶16

perusal of the FIR, there is no specific allegation against these petitioners rather the allegation is general and omnibus. Case and counter case. Both parties have sustained injuries in the alleged occurrence. The injuries sustained by the informant’s side are simple in nature. It is lastly submitted that petitioners have got clean antecedent.

¶17

Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application.

¶18

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of injuries, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No. 76 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶19

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶20

utkarsh/-

¶21

U T

Chandrakant Sahni @ Chandraket Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrakant Sahni @ Chandraket Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Kshtriya Sonu Ahiran Vs The State of Bihar

Zakir Hussain @ Md. Jakir Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Raghunandan Kumar @ Raghunandan Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Sharma Vs The State of Bihar