Allowed

Jagriti Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Feb 2024CR. MISC./7477/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner apprehended arrest in a case under Sections 307/34 IPC prayed for anticipatory bail. The Court noted allegations were primarily against co-accused and the petitioner claimed clean antecedents. The prayer for anticipatory bail was allowed.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed for six weeks upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount.

Jagriti Kumari Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7477 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-993 Year-2023 Thana- SHASTRINAGAR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jagriti Kumari D/O Ramawadh Singh R/O East Laxmi Nagar, New By-Pass, N.H.-30, Khemni Chak, New Jaganpura, P.S- Ram Krishna Nagar, Distt.Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Singh, Addl Public Prosecutor ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 20-02-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307/34 of the Indian

¶14

Penal Code.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that from bare perusal of the FIR it is clear that there is no allegation of firing against the petitioner rather this allegation is against co-accused Vishal Ranjan Singh. Petitioner’s name has come in this case during course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Puja Kumari. Moreover, the mobile number from which petitioner is alleged to have made call to the informant does not belong to her, rather it belongs to co-accused Puja Kumari. Petitioner claims clean

¶16

antecedent.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7477 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/2

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IX, Patna in Shastri Nagar Police Station Case No. 993 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶20

Shashi

¶21

U T

Jagriti Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagriti Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gagan Ray Vs the State of Bihar

Ramanand Singh @ Ramanand Singh Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Shobha Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Dr. Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Abhishek Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Jakir Sai @ Jakir Hussain Vs The State of Bihar