Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the quashing application with liberty to raise issues later. The court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the application with liberty to raise issues at an appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7415 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-509 Year-2017 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Lakhisarai
====================================================== Bideshi Yadav @ Bindi Yadav S/o Late Bharosi Yadav, R/o Dadhisir, P.O.Bannu Bagicha, P.S.- Chanan, District- Lakhisarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay- A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
learned A.P.P. for the State.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
Bideshi Yadav @ Bindi Yadav
The State Of Bihar
Bindeshwari Yadav
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
