Allowed

Mahadev Chaudhari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Mar 2024CR. MISC./73911/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought by two accused facing charges including Section 307 and 354(B) IPC over omnibus allegations of assault and outraging a woman's modesty. The court noted the omnibus nature and absence of criminal antecedents, granted bail subject to payment of Rs. 5,000 each toward medical assistance and conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on anticipatory bail on bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions and Rs. 5,000 each paid to informant via Demand Draft.

Mahadev Chaudhari Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73911 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-419 Year-2023 Thana- MASAUDHI District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MAHADEV CHAUDHARI SON OF SHIV CHAUDHARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GURPATICHAK, PS- MASAURHI, DISTT- PATNA

¶5

SAHDEV CHAUDHARI SON OF SHIV CHAUDHARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GURPATICHAK, PS- MASAURHI, DISTT- PATNA

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

ORAL ORDER

3 05-03-2024

Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

¶16

connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 419 of 2023 for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 307, 379 and 34 of the I.P.C. lodged on 20.06.2023 by the informant, Sanjeera Devi.

¶17

As per the prosecution story, the informant has alleged that when they were sleeping on the roof after taking dinner, the accused persons came and assaulted him on the head, causing injury. Further allegation is of outraging the modesty of the woman. Accordingly, the FIR.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that a

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73911 of 2023(3) dt.05-03-2024 2/4

¶20

bare perusal of the FIR would show that omnibus allegation has been made, there is nothing on record to show that the said injury is grievous in nature, they are agnates and only to exaggerate the implication, the allegation of outraging the modesty. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that without accepting the allegation and/or the outcome of the present petition, in view of the fact that the informant side has alleged injuries, the petitioners on their own would like to contribute towards the medical assistance of Rs. 5,000/- each (total Rs. 10,000/-) through Demand Draft issued by the local State Bank of India branch to be submitted before the ‘NAZARAT’ of concerned Court to be handed over to the informant after checking the credentials.

¶21

Learned APP opposes the prayer.

¶22

Taking into account the submissions put

¶23

forward by the parties as also that there is omnibus allegation and none of the two petitioners have criminal antecedent, this Court is inclined to extend them privilege of anticipatory bail subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/- each as undertaken by the learned counsel for the petitioners to be paid by Demand Draft of local State Bank of India to be

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73911 of 2023(3) dt.05-03-2024 3/4

¶25

submitted to the Trial Court.

¶26

Let the petitioners be released on bail in the

¶27

event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Masaurhi in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 419 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶28

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioners who shall provide official document to show their bona fide;

¶29

(ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every

¶30

date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

¶31

(iii) the petitioners shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his attendance;

¶32

(iv) the petitioners shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the

¶33

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73911 of 2023(3) dt.05-03-2024 4/4

¶34

evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

¶35

(v) the petitioners shall desist from committing

¶36

any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.

¶37

With the aforesaid observations, the anticipatory

¶38

bail application is allowed.

¶39

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶40

Adnan/-

¶41

U T

Mahadev Chaudhari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahadev Chaudhari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxman Prasad Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Shaiqua Tabassum Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Ram, Vs The State of Bihar

Mritunjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Golu Kumar @ Sunny Saurav Vs The State of Bihar

Ekhlaque Ahmad @ Akhlak Ahamad @ Ekhlakh Vs The State of Bihar