Partly allowed

Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Kumar Yadav v. The Union of India through the S.P. Ncb, Patna

Patna HC20 Sept 2024CR. MISC./69703/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court modified an order granting anticipatory bail by replacing the father 'Bhuteli Ray' with the petitioner's wife 'Rinku Kumari' as a co-bailor due to the father's prior death.

What did the court decide?

The order dated 02.09.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 55264 of 2024 is modified to require the petitioner's wife, Rinku Kumari, as one of the bailors instead of his deceased father.

Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Kumar Yadav Vs The Union of India… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69703 of 2024

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55264 of 2024

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2023 Thana- N.C.B (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Patna

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Kumar Yadav S/o Late Bhuteli Ray R/o vill - Paiga Sheikhpura, P.S. - Amnaur, Distt. - Saran at Chapra

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The Union of India through the S.P. NCB, Patna Bihar

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur- Advocate For Union of India : Ms. Shail Kumari- C.G.C. ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 20-09-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶15

learned APP for the State.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶17

petitioner had moved this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.55264 of 2024 and the same was allowed by an order dated 02.09.2024 with a condition that one of the bailor of the petitioner shall be his father, namely, Bhuteli Ray.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in Cr. Misc. No. 55264 of 2024, inadvertently, the word “Late” could not be prefixed before the name of Bhuteli Ray. It is next submitted that father of the petitioner had died much prior to filing of Cr. Misc. No.55264 of 2024. It is thus submitted that

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69703 of 2024(2) dt.20-09-2024 2/2

¶20

the order dated 02.09.2024 is modified to the extent that one of the bailor of the petitioner instead of his father should be his

¶21

wife namely, Rinku Kumari.

¶22

The learned C.G.C. does not oppose the

¶23

modification application.

¶24

Considering the submissions, the order dated 02.09.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.55264 of 2024 is modified to the extent indicated above.

¶25

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶26

vikash/-

¶27

U T

Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Kumar Yadav v. The Union of India through the S.P. Ncb, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Kumar Yadav v. The Union of India through the S.P. Ncb, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karunesh Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Poonam Devi @ Punam Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotelal Singh @ Chhotelal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Antarjani Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Chhota Pandey @ Chhotu Pandey Vs The State of Bihar