This order grants regular bail to the petitioner in a robbery and arms case, considering allegations of false implication due to politics and the co-accused's prior bail grant.
Petitioner released on bail with bond of Rs. 10,000/- and two sureties of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69024 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2021 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran
======================================================
Rajesh Sahani S/o Rupnarayan Sahani R/o Village- Madhuchapra, P.SBairganiya, District- Sitamarhi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prateek Tandon For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 20-09-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application, for grant of regular bail, arises out of Dhaka (Pachpakari) Police Station Case No. 453 of 2021, disclosing offences under Sections 393 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-b)a, 26, 35, 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, on 14.09.2021, at about 7:00 pm, informant was intercepted by four unknown miscreants and they demanded money from the informant and on refusal, one of the miscreant fired upon him. It is further alleged that co-accused Ajay Raut was apprehended from the spot while others managed to flee away.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69024 of 2024(2) dt.20-09-2024 2/3
petitioner is innocent and falsely been implicated in the present case due to dirty village politics and prior enmity with coaccused Ajay Raut. He next submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. He next submits that the name of the petitioner in the present case has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Ajay Raut with whom, petitioner had inimical terms. He further submits that none of the independent witnesses has supported the prosecution case. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused Ajay Raut has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 2754 of 2022 vide order dated 26.05.2022. The petitioner is in custody since 31.03.2024.
5. Regards being had to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner got implicated due to dirty village politics, his name got transpired on the basis of confessional statement of Ajay Raut who is the co-accused in the present case and has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 2754 of 2022 vide order dated 26.05.2022, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.
6. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69024 of 2024(2) dt.20-09-2024 3/3
two sureties of the like amount, each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection to the Dhaka (Pachpakari) Police Station Case No. 453 of 2021, disclosing offences under Sections 393 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-b)a, 26, 35, 27 of the Arms Act.
7. This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present themselves before the Court, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
HarshPandey/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner in charges of robbery and arms offences.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Cr. Misc. No. 2754 of 2022Referred¶4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajesh Sahani
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
