The petitioner challenged an earlier rejection of bail in a murder conspiracy case. Noting the trial was near completion, the learned Single Judge disposed of the second bail application summarily without detailed analysis.
The second application for regular bail was disposed of summarily.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66926 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-451 Year-2022 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Avinash Kumar S/O Hari Narayan Singh @ Hari Nandan Singh R/O VillageKatahara, P.S- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Davendra Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pronoti Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 12-01-2024
This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant
of regular bail as earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 23.05.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 26718 of 2023.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner considering the trial is on the verge of completion.
Whether the second attempt for bail requires detailed scrutiny given the pendency status.
5 provisions across 1 enactments
Avinash Kumar
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
