Allowed

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Dec 2024CR. MISC./66788/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under NDPS Act after recovery of 1.750 kg ganja from the petitioner's bag; quantity stated to be below commercial. Considering period of custody since 01.07.2024, the Patna High Court granted bail on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties, with a condition of physical appearance on each date.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount, with condition of physical presence before court below on each date.

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66788 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2024 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Prasad Yadav Son of Late Budhan Yadav Resident of Village - Chhatapur, P.S.- Andhramath, District - Madhubani.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Bharti For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 17-12-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P for the State.

¶14

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Andhramath P.S. Case No. 114/2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 46/2024 dated 30.06.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 8, 20(b)(ii) (B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶15

3. As per the prosecution case, total 1.750 kgs. Ganja was recovered from the bag of the petitioner.

¶16

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The seized contraband is less than commercial quantity. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66788 of 2024(3) dt.17-12-2024 2/2

¶18

recovery. The petitioner has six antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 01.07.2024.

¶19

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶20

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani in connection with Andhramath P.S. Case No. 114/2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 46/2024, with the condition ;-

¶21

(i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

¶22

7. The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

atul/-

¶25

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Singh @ Manjeet Singh @ Manjeet Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dilchand Sao Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Azad @ Azad Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Kumar @ Jailar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar