Allowed¶21

Ajay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Feb 2024CR. MISC./6628/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Section 30(a); Nadi P.S. Case No. 386 of 2023; mahua liquor recovery 60 liters; Section 100 Cr.P.C. compliance; charge-sheet filed; custody since 21.11.2023; one criminal antecedent; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; Patna High Court; Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra; Crl. Misc. No. 6628 of 2024.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Nadi P.S. case No. 386 of 2023. ¶21

Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6628 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-386 Year-2023 Thana- NADI P.S. District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajay Kumar Son of Naresh Mistry R/o Mohalla - Kachhi Dargah, P.S. - Nadi, Distt. - Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Vishwakarma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 17-02-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in Nadi P.S. case No. 386 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

The prosecution case, in short, is that at evening patrolling, on raid, 60 liters mahua liquor was recovered from the hut.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. No incriminating material has been

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6628 of 2024(2) dt.17-02-2024 2/2

¶17

recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 21.11.2023 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

¶19

opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Nadi P.S. case No. 386 of 2023.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Pankaj/-

Ajay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ahmad Raza Vs the State of Bihar

Pappu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Arshad @ Md. Arsad @ Saddab @ Arshad D @ Md. Arasad @ Shadab @ Sadab @ Arasad Vs the State of Bihar

Om Prakash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Darogi Sharma Vs The State of Bihar