Allowed

Soyeb Akhtar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Sept 2024CR. MISC./65719/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought regular bail in a Kishanganj Arms Act case after alleged recovery of a country-made pistol from their shop. Noting clean antecedents and about two and a half months in custody, the court granted bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two like-amount sureties to CJM Kishanganj, subject to trial-cooperation condition.

Soyeb Akhtar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65719 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2024 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SOYEB AKHTAR S/O- MD. HASIB R/o- Khirdaha Samda W.No-5, Ps Dist- Kishanganj

¶5

SOHAIL AKHTAR S/O- MD. HASIB R/o- Khirdaha Samda W.No-5, Ps Dist- Kishanganj

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 23-09-2024

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

The petitioners are seeking regular bail in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 245 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b), 26, 35 of the Arms Act, 1959.

¶16

Allegedly, a country-made pistol is said to have been recovered from the stool kept in the shop of the petitioner.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are the persons of clean antecedents and are under custody since 02.07.2024.

¶18

Considering the above-mentioned facts and

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65719 of 2024(2) dt.23-09-2024 2/2

¶20

circumstances coupled with the fact that the petitioners are the persons of clean antecedents and they are in custody for two and a half month, let the petitioners above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 245 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:-

¶21

(i) The petitioners shall cooperate in the

¶22

disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.

¶23

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶24

Nirmal/- U T

Soyeb Akhtar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Soyeb Akhtar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jamuna Singh @ Yamuna Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jai Ram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Lalan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shobha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar