Single judge rejected regular bail petition in a murder case where petitioner is alleged to have shot and killed the informant's brother. Court granted fresh bail and ordered trial expedition.
Prayer for regular bail rejected; trial court directed to expedite trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65282 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2023 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura
======================================================
Abdhesh Yadav @ Avdhesh Yadav Son of Late Parbhu Yadav R/O - Pathalaphar, P.S - Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhupura
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Rina Sinha, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Dinkar Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
2 04-12-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65282 of 2024(2) dt.04-12-2024 2/3
shot on his mouth, as a result of which, the brother of the informant died.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65282 of 2024(2) dt.04-12-2024 3/3
Court is not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner implicated in a murder case under sections 302 and 34 IPC?
Whether the trial should be expedited given the grave nature of allegations?
Abdhesh Yadav @ Avdhesh Yadav
The State of Bihar
Dr. Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
