Dismissed¶20

Birendra Sada @ Biren Sada v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Feb 2024CR. MISC./65143/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail rejected; regular bail denial; Sections 392 IPC; loot at gun point; Hathauri P.S. Case No. 95 of 2015; Samastipur; Tr. No. 300 of 2022; habitual offender; criminal antecedents (accused in 29 cases, acquitted in 11, on bail in 17); charge framed 17.07.2018; trial pending; trial expected within three months; Patna High Court CR. MISC.; Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra; petitioner Birendra Sada @ Biren Sada; counsel Manish Chandra Gandhi; APP Ashok Kumar Singh.

What did the court decide?

Taking into account the facts and circumstances, the petitioner's criminal antecedents and the stage of trial, the Court was not inclined to grant the privilege of regular bail and rejected the bail prayer. ¶20

Birendra Sada @ Biren Sada Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65143 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2015 Thana- HATHAURI District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BIRENDRA SADA @ BIREN SADA, Son of Ram Ashish Sada, R/o vill - Khetapur, P.S. - Sarai Ranjan, Distt.- Samastipur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 08-02-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Tr. No. 300 of 2022 arising out of Hathauri P.S. Case No. 95 of 2015 for the offence registered under Sections 392 of the I.P.C.

¶14

Allegation against the petitioner and the other coaccused persons is of committing loot on gun point with the informant while he was on his shop and fled away.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Save and except the confessional statement of the petitioner there is no material against the petitioner. Neither the petitioner was arrested on spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65143 of 2023(5) dt.08-02-2024 2/2

¶17

possession. He has been remanded in this case from the other case and in this case charge has already been framed on 17.07.2018 but the trial of the case has not been concluded. Although the petitioner is accused in 29 cases, however, he has been acquitted in 11 cases and he is on bail in 17 cases.

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner and submits that there is enough material against the petitioner and the petitioner is a habitual criminal having 29 criminal antecedents.

¶19

It appears from the report of the court concerned it is expected that the trial is likely to be concluded in three months.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact and circumstances and the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and stage of trial, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of regular bail to the petitioner and, as such, his prayer for bail is rejected.

¶21

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

¶22

khushbu/-

¶23

Birendra Sada @ Biren Sada v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Birendra Sada @ Biren Sada v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhiraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Akhil Das @ Akil Das Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Atif Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kamti @ Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Naresh Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Satish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar