Allowed

Abdul Hamid Sheikh @ Abdul Hamid v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Jul 2024CR. MISC./6371/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to quash cognizance order passed by C.J.M., Buxar in a complaint case. Both parties settled their dispute and jointly sought quashing. Allowing the application, the High Court quashed the cognizance order dated 08.03.2018.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 08.03.2018 passed in Complaint Case No. 250(C)/2017 taking cognizance against the petitioner was quashed.

Abdul Hamid Sheikh @ Abdul Hamid Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6371 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2017 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE District-

¶3

Buxar

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Abdul Hamid Sheikh @ Abdul Hamid Son Of Abdul Rahim Resident Of C. K. 50/70, Hakak Tola, Mohalla - Kashipura, P.S.- Chowk, District - Varanashi At Present Residing At Number 887b, Block- B, Simpang 883, House No.887b, Jangsak Jalan Gadong, Jangsak, 2nd Floor, Unit- B, Jangsak Kampong Jansak, Brunai - Mauara Bf 2720, Country - Brunei Darussalam Through His Brother And Power Of Attorney Holder Mohammad Zishan, Son Of Abdul Rahim, Resident Of C. K. 50/70, Hakak Tola, Mohalla - Kashipura, P.S.Chowk, District - Varanashi.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶9

Sima Khanam Wife of Abdul Hamid Sheikh @ Abdul Hamid Daughter of Mansoor Ali Khan, Resident of village - Bara, P.O.- Bara, P.S.- Bara, District - Gajipur (Uttar Pradesh) at present residing at C/o Saheb Ali Khan, Jawahar Nawoday School, Village - Nawanagar, P.S.- Nawanagar, District - Buxar.

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 09-07-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶15

This is an application for quashing the order

¶16

dated 08.03.2018 passed by the learned C.J.M., Buxar in Complaint Case No. 250(C)/2017 by which the cognizance has been taken against the petitioner.

¶17

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri Rajesh Ranjan and learned counsel for the O.P. No. 02; Mr. Dhananjay Kr. Tiwari that both the parties have settled their dispute and therefore they jointly prayed for

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6371 of 2023(4) dt.09-07-2024 2/2

¶19

quashing of the present case.

¶20

In view of the settlement between the parties,

¶21

this application is allowed and the order dated 08.03.2018 passed in Complaint Case No. 250(C)/2017 is hereby quashed.

¶22

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶23

Shishir/-

¶24

Abdul Hamid Sheikh @ Abdul Hamid v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Hamid Sheikh @ Abdul Hamid v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Tiwari @ Anupam Rahul Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Tinku Alam @ Ehsan Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Chatterjee Vs The State of Bihar

Rubi Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rajnish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar