Allowed

Sonu Kumar Yadav @ Sonu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Sept 2024CR. MISC./62491/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a PC case involving robbery and theft under IPC and Arms Act, subject to ensuring appearance in pending cases, furnishing bonds, and complying with specific conditions to prevent tampering or re-offending.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted by furnishing bail bond of Rs. 30,000 with two sureties, subject to appearing in pending cases and other conditions.

Sonu Kumar Yadav @ Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62491 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2022 Thana- BHAWANIPUR District- Purnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SONU KUMAR YADAV @ SONU KUMAR SON OF LATE GODE YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TINTANGA KARARI,P.S.GOPALPUR, BHGALAPUR

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 04-09-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bhawanipur P.S. Case No.133 of 2022 lodged under Sections 394, 411 of the I.P.C. read with Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

¶17

As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against three named accused persons including the petitioner in which one co-accused was caught red handed by the villagers and then he had disclosed the name of two more persons including the petitioner. The allegation against the accused persons is that they have snatched Rs.400/- from the informant’s pocket and also took away his motorcycle.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that one accused Govind Kumar who has disclosed the name of

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62491 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 2/3

¶20

the petitioner, granted bail by this Court dated 08.05.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.19655 of 2024.

¶21

Counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 20.05.2023 having 4 criminal cases pending against him. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody more than other co-accused persons.

¶22

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner’s antecedent is not clean.

¶23

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail, 3 (three) months after framing of charge, if not framed as well as on being satisfied by the trial court that the petitioner is not absconding in any of the cases which are pending against him whose details are mentioned below, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Purnea in connection with Bhawanipur P.S. Case No.133 of 2022, subject to the following conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. with other following conditions:-

¶24

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide;

¶25

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62491 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 3/3

¶27

before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds by the Trial Court itself;

¶28

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month for one year to mark attendance;

¶29

(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; and

¶30

(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.

¶31

The details of the cases which are pending against the petitioner, are as follows:-

¶32

i. Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 209 of 2016.

¶33

ii. Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 200 of 2017. iii. Gopalpur P.S. Case No.308 of 2017.

¶34

iv. Gopalpur P.S. Case no. 310 of 2017.

¶35

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶36

Prakashmani/-

¶37

U T

Sonu Kumar Yadav @ Sonu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Kumar Yadav @ Sonu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Seema Kumari @ Seema Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ramchandra Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Kiran Kumari @ Kiran Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Smt. Basanti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar Yadav @ Krishna Kumar Bharti Vs The State of Bihar