Dismissed¶15

Vikash kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Sept 2024CR. MISC./61994/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court oral order dated 13-09-2024 by Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan rejecting regular bail for petitioner Vikash Kumar in Criminal Miscellaneous No.61994 of 2024, arising out of Digha P.S. Case No.474 of 2020, Thana-Digha, District-Patna, registered under Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act for alleged sale of ganja; bail refused in view of facts and circumstances including one prior similar-nature criminal antecedent; petitioner in custody since 23.04.2024; charge framed; no precedent cited; single-member bench.

What did the court decide?

Considering the facts and circumstances (including the petitioner's criminal antecedent in a similar offence), the Court was not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and rejected his prayer for regular bail in connection with Digha P.S. Case No.474 of 2020. ¶15

Vikash kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61994 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-474 Year-2020 Thana- DIGHA District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vikash Kumar S/O Late Vinay Ray @ Binay Rai @ Vinay Rai R/O Vill - Makhdumpur, P.S- Digha, Distt- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Saroj Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kalyan Shankar ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 13-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶10

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Digha P.S. Case No.474 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable u/s 20, 22 of the NDPS Act.

¶11

The petitioner is said to have used to sell Ganja.

¶12

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. Petitioner has been made accused in this case on the basis of statement of co-accused. No incriminating contraband article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. Charge has been framed against the petitioner. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent in similar nature of offence and he is in custody since 23.04.2024.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61994 of 2024(2) dt.13-09-2024 2/2

¶14

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that petitioner has one criminal antecedent in similar nature of offence.

¶15

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for regular bail is rejected in connection with Digha P.S. Case No.474 of 2020.

¶16

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶17

devendra/-

¶18

U T

Vikash kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Shankar Prasad @ Shankar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Arya College, Jahagirpur, Salkhani, Mahua, Vaishali, Bihar Vs The Chancellor of Universities

Mankeshwar Nath Pathak @ Makeshwar Nath Pathak, Vs The State of Bihar

Radhe Sahni @ Radhe Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shivbrat Yadav Vs The State of Bihar