Rajesh Mishra Vs the State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 27-02-2024

¶12

Heard Mr. Ashutosh Nath, learned counsel appearing

¶13

on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 349 dated 2021 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 420, 409, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the allegation made in the FIR, on the basis of inspection conducted by the District Magistrate with respect to the misappropriation of fund found in implementation of the Nali Gali Yojana in Bharoli Gram Panchayat, P.S.- Shahpur, Bhojpur. The petitioner is Panchayat Secretary of Ward No.5 of the said village, for which total sum of Rs.14 lakhs was allocated for completion of the Nali Gali Yojana.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61888 of 2023(4) dt.27-02-2024 2/3

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that it is not a case that the inspecting team found that no work has been completed but they have shown the work is not satisfactory and it did not need the requirement parameter. He submitted that the petitioner can not be held to have committed crime for the act, which can be rectified by him. The petitioner has admittedly completed the work as per the work order and the payments were made by him to the beneficiaries, as well as, the trader(s), from whom the material was purchased, as per requirement of the scheme.

¶18

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

¶19

Considering the rival submission made on behalf of the parties, as well as, in compliance of interim order dated 11.10.2023, the work was completed to the total value of Rs.13,58,000/- and the remaining amount of 77,000/-, which was required to be paid by the petitioner, has already been credited into the account of the State Treasury (Annexure-P3). The petitioner, in support of the said claim, has filed supplementary affidavit bringing on record the challan, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61888 of 2023(4) dt.27-02-2024 3/3

¶21

below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate – I, Ara in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 349 dated 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Purnendu Singh, J.)

¶23

Ashishsingh/-

¶24

U T

Rajesh Mishra v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Mishra v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarvar Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Nishu Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Nira Devi @ Nira Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Aditya Kumar Singh @ Aditya Kumar @ Mohan Vs the State of Bihar

Sanoj Sahani @ Sanoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar