Usha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 17-10-2024 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Mahua Police Station Case No. 668 of 2022, dated 23.10.2022, disclosing offences punishable under Sections 341/323/324/307/354/379/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that on 19.10.2022, all the named accused persons, including the petitioners, demolished the boundary wall behind his house and took away household articles along with them. On protest, they became angry and demanded a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/-. The allegation against the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61780 of 2024(2) dt.17-10-2024 2/3

¶17

petitioner no. 1 is that she pulled the informant’s wife with her hair, threw her on the ground and assaulted her and the allegation against the petitioner no. 2 is that he assaulted the informant by means of lathi and hasua sickle).

¶18

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that both the parties are co-sharers and next door neighbours and there is land dispute between them since long. He further submits that there is case and counter case inasmuch as Mahua Police Station Case No. 670 of 2022, under Section 341/323/324/307/354-B/379/427/504/506/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code was lodged by the husband of petitioner no. 1 against the informant and others. The nature of injury caused to the victim has not been brought and in the impugned order, it has only been said that the nature of injury is serious.

¶19

Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that both the parties are co-sharers and there is previous land dispute between them, I am inclined to grant the petitioners privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶20

This application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61780 of 2024(2) dt.17-10-2024 3/3

¶22

Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class,, Vaishali, at Hajipur, in connection with Mahua Police Station Case No. 668 of 2022, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶23

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶24

Prabhakar Anand/-

Usha Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Usha Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kaushalya Kumari Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Himanshu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Alok Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Sandeep Chaudhary @ Sandeep Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vindyavasini Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Tinku @ Bhutta Vs The State of Bihar