Sangita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Amit Anand For the Opposite Party : Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 22-08-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

Earlier the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 25.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 29598/2024 due to unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner could not furnish bail bonds before the Court below within the stipulated time.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to extent the time for furnishing the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶16

In view of the matter, let the time be further extended by four weeks for furnishing the bail bonds /

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61371 of 2024(2) dt.22-08-2024 2/2

¶18

surrendering before the court concerned from the receipt of this order.

¶19

Accordingly, the modification application is

¶20

allowed and the order dated 25.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 29598/2024 is modified to the above extent.

¶21

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶22

atul/-

¶23

U T

Sangita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sila Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlu Kumar Sharma @ Kamlu Sharma Vs the State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Bajrangi @ Bajrangi Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Arbind Chaudhary @ Arbind Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar